I tried something new last night, and enjoyed it far more than I anticipated I would. We took my 85-year old mother-in-law, a life-long opera devotee, to see the Metropolitan Opera production of "Lucia de Lammermoor" by Donnizetti, but did so without the high expense of travelling to Manhattan. We sat comfortably in one of our local movie theatres, courtesy of the "Metropolitan Opera in HD" series.
http://www.metoperafamily.org/metopera/broadcast/hd_events_next.aspx
The Met, thanks to a "generous grant from the Neubauer Family Foundation", presents a series of 11 opera performances in a season that runs from September through May. Some of the operas are familiar classics, while others are new, or lesser-known selections from great composers. Each opera is usually presented live (usually as a Saturday matinee), or in weekday evening "encore" performaces. Our tickets were $18 apiece, well below New York prices, and series tickets are available.
I have seen a few local or regional operas in my time, and usually had trouble remaining awake. The talent level in this Met performance, however, was mesmerizing, particularly a young tenor who had been performing in a Russian-language opera at the Met, but was given two-days' notice to prepare to sing, in Italian, the role of Edgardo, an intense, emotional, and complex role, because the usual performer was ill. I will admit that the subtitles helped quite a bit, once you got over the Japanese-movie-like fact that there were far fewer words printed than were being sung.
"Lucia" was well-sung and acted, with many extended ovations by the Met audience. The story, similar to Romeo and Juliet in that two lovers are kept apart by feuding families, only to drive the woman to madness and the man to suicide, was compelling and interesting. My only issue with the performance was that the 20-minute intermissions (two in this production) were lengthened by interviews with various performers to where they were more like 25-30 minutes. In a live performance, with the massive set changes of "Lucia", these long intermissions are necessary, but in an "Encore" performance, while the interviews were interesting, but the set changes, well, a little fast-forward might be in order, particularly on a weekday night.
A Metropolitan Opera is worth seeing if for no other reason than the spectacle of the thing. The talent is incredible - for example, the Conductor likened his job with the Met's orchestra to "driving a Ferrari." The vocal talent is amazing, and the acting is pretty decent, within the genre, of course. As I said, I am no opera fan, but this was far more enjoyable than I would ever have guessed. My mother-in-law was so thrilled she was asking on the way home when the next opera was scheduled, and wants to go again. And she's seen the Met at the Met, so she's hard to impress.
Give it a look - Madame Butterfly by Puccini is next up, and I guarantee this will be better than the movie version of "Miss Saigon."

Recent Comments